Pitching is such a vital part of the game, as far as winning is concerned.

On most teams the set up man has become more valuable, on others not so valuable.

Something to keep in mind — it’s raining lightly. The infield could be very wet on ground balls.

What is a drop and drive pitcher? He is a guy who drops and drives. Very simple.

So by guessing right you might have guessed wrong.

Giambi walks too much. He’s always clogging up the bases with all that walking.

As a new day begins in New York, the sun sets in Hawaii.

If football is a game of inches then baseball is a game of inch.

If that ball had more elevation, it would have been a home run.

If the double play is a pitcher’s best friend, what is a fielder’s choice? An acquaintance?

It’s better to have a fast runner on base than a slow one.

One thing about ground balls. They don’t go out of the ball park.

The reason we call that pitch up and in is because the arms are attached to the shoulder.

He wears his hat like a left hander!

Any ball that goes down is much heavier than any ball that stays on the same plane.

The blood on his sock looks exactly like Oklahoma!

You don't want to use too many statistics. The ones that apply to a July or August game won't be relevant on Saturday.

American McCarver

basketball

Malcolm Gladwell on Bruce Ratner and the Barclays Center [Link]

Malcolm Gladwell:

The rich have gone from being grateful for what they have to pushing for everything they can get. They have mastered the arts of whining and predation, without regard to logic or shame. In the end, this is the lesson of the NBA lockout. A man buys a basketball team as insurance on a real estate project, flips the franchise to a Russian billionaire when he wins the deal, and then — as both parties happily count their winnings — what lesson are we asked to draw? The players are greedy.

basketball
New Jersey Nets
Malcolm Gladwell

Artest officially changes name to “Metta World Peace”

Some stories just write themselves:

After a slight delay thanks to some unpaid parking tickets, the Los Angeles Lakers forward formerly known as Ron Artest has officially become Metta World Peace.

The three-week holdup was settled Friday, the parking tickets were paid, and after a short court hearing, Mr. World Peace was well on his way to promoting the ideals behind his new name. “Changing my name was meant to inspire and bring youth together all around the world,” World Peace said. His first name, Metta, is based on a Buddhist term meaning love and kindness to all.

Also Top 10 Dubious Name Changes.

basketball

Pat Summit Reveals Dementia Diagnosis

There’s not going to be any pity party […] and as far as I’m concerned it’s not going to keep me from living my life, not going to keep me from coaching.”

Summit has 1,079 career victories and 8 national championships. She’s a class act. We wish her all the best.

Tennessee
basketball

The worm in The Hall

Dennis Rodman is being enshrined in the Basketball Hall of Fame today. I loved watching Rodman play. He quietly antagonized every opponent, got in their heads, made them take the first swing, and then manage to look at the referee with genuine shock, SHOCK!, when he was called for a foul.

And he backed it up with an uncanny ability to “fetch the ball,” as Phil Jackson called it, winning seven rebounding titles in his career.

Also, he fucked Madonna, back when it mattered.

Sadly, he’s mostly remembered now for his antics off the court. A legacy which he’s brought upon himself. The off the court stuff bugged me, but not for the reasons you’d think. The on-court antics were sublime. He was one of a kind. A fucked up Eddie Haskell-like god of mischief and rebounding. Off the court? Whatever. I’ve known weirder.

Check out the video below. The way he wraps himself around Malone, the dirtiest player in the NBA, while making it look like he’s just trying to get himself up is masterful. This was somebody who enjoyed going to work.

basketball
For a month now — eight practices and two pre-season games — I have been the coach of a kids’ basketball team.  The squad is composed of nine-, ten- and eleven-year-olds, of vastly different experience and skill.

This makes for some awkward basketball.  One brief session involved explaining that you cannot walk while holding the ball.  The three-second rule has exposed our school system’s inability to teach kids to count higher than two. And, no, you will never, ever make that half-court shot.  How do I know?  Because the ball is landing on the free-throw line — that’s how I know.

But these are impressionable young minds, and I’ve been given the rare opportunity to bend them to my will shape the outlook and attitude they’ll use for the rest of their lives.  Basketball is a game, yes, but it’s also a metaphor.  I’m going to put my English minor to use one way or another.

So at the first practice, the team gathered around me, I ask a question:  “Who is the greatest basketball player of all time?”

“Jordan!” one kid shouts immediately.

“Wrong!  Run a lap.”  I’m molding minds here — it’s not a job for the timid.

“Kobe!” says another.

“Wrong!  Run a lap.”

“LeBron!”

“Wrong!  Run ten laps, but don’t circle around — just head off in one direction.  No, don’t wait for green lights.”  He trots off and I assume that he eventually made it home.  Whatever.

“The best basketball player of all time is Magic Johnson.  This is a team sport, and he was the ultimate team player.  He’s the guy they invented the triple-double for.  He made everybody else on the court better.  That’s what each of you is here to do.”

“Coach—”

“Run a lap!  Some of you have been playing basketball for a long time, and have the advantage of entering puberty during the Bush Administration.  Others have clearly confused basketball and basketweaving.  Either way, we are a team.  We win together or we lose together!  Nobody has a good game, unless everybody has  a good game!  We fight and we die together!  Stop crying!  We shall always aspire to teamhood.  Teamness.  Teamosity.  It was a minor; gimme a break.”

“Yes, Coach.”

“OK!  Run a lap!”

But, of course, words are words and on-court glory is on-court glory and the fact that these kids — the future of basketball; the future of society — picked Jordan and Kobe and LeBron before Johnson is telling.

Later that day, on the very first play of our very first scrimmage, the biggest kid on the team — one of the most experienced — brings the ball across the line, puts his shoulder down, drives the lane and… misses.  Badly.

OK, fine.  Jitters.  First day.

But then he does it again.  And again.  And again.  Despite other players who were open more often than not.  Despite the gentle guiding hand of his coach.  Despite the innate need of human beings to gather together and distribute the risk of existence across a collective.

No passes, no looks, just a straight shot for the glory.  That he kept missing was almost irrelevant.

But what can you expect, really?  What gets shown on the highlight reels?  What gets talked about the next day?  What gets the ad contracts and the shoe deals and the unfortunate paternity suits?

You will never hear someone on ESPN say, “And here’s a solid utility player, making sure that Mr. Twenty Million Dollars actually has the ball.”

In a particularly American way, we are obsessed with the Great Man, even in the context of teams.  We are drawn to stand-outs, even when their efforts don’t or can’t add up to a victory.  Our fundamentally egalitarian society is at war with itself over the place of individual exceptionalism.  Don’t make me go all de Tocqueville on your ass.  My major was political science.

“Heroes,” some doofus once said, “rise to the occasion.”  Except they don’t.  They’re helped there, by teammates, by families, by society.  Yes, cheering individuals is natural.  They put a human face on an abstract concept like teams, or companies, or political parties.  They allow us to see ourselves.

But our tendency to pack up all the glory into a nice little box and hand it entirely to one person is damaging, not only to whatever cohesiveness holds that team together, but to culture at large.  Every kid who sees a strutting ball-hog feted on the tube is one step closer to trying — probable not succeeding, but trying — to be a strutting ball-hog himself.  To the detriment of everybody.

Team sports are the purest sports, because they aren’t about the individual, or shouldn’t be.  They’re about banding together and doing more together than you can separately.  They are models for something larger.  Some people are always going to stand out from the crowd they run with, but unless and until their work makes the whole better, it’s not going to add up to much.  When it does, when the whole team benefits, it’s beautiful.  When it doesn’t, well, that’s just one more high-profile loser.

The irony that I singled out Magic Johnson as a standard-bearer for teamwork is not lost on me.  But the entire concept of a “team” needs starts somewhere.  It’s not the draft or the assignments by the Rec Center and it’s certainly not SportsCenter or the maddened crowd.  It’s when someone says: We can do this better together.

That kid, the big one?  He’s passing now.  He still palpably wants the ball, but if he doesn’t have a shot, he’ll give it to a teammate, who will then shoot and miss just as badly.

But I’m calling it progress.

There's No "I" In Magic

For a month now — eight practices and two pre-season games — I have been the coach of a kids’ basketball team. The squad is composed of nine-, ten- and eleven-year-olds, of vastly different experience and skill.

This makes for some awkward basketball. One brief session involved explaining that you cannot walk while holding the ball. The three-second rule has exposed our school system’s inability to teach kids to count higher than two. And, no, you will never, ever make that half-court shot. How do I know? Because the ball is landing on the free-throw line — that’s how I know.

But these are impressionable young minds, and I’ve been given the rare opportunity to bend them to my will shape the outlook and attitude they’ll use for the rest of their lives. Basketball is a game, yes, but it’s also a metaphor. I’m going to put my English minor to use one way or another.

So at the first practice, the team gathered around me, I ask a question: “Who is the greatest basketball player of all time?”

“Jordan!” one kid shouts immediately.

“Wrong! Run a lap.” I’m molding minds here — it’s not a job for the timid.

“Kobe!” says another.

“Wrong! Run a lap.”

“LeBron!”

“Wrong! Run ten laps, but don’t circle around — just head off in one direction. No, don’t wait for green lights.” He trots off and I assume that he eventually made it home. Whatever.

“The best basketball player of all time is Magic Johnson. This is a team sport, and he was the ultimate team player. He’s the guy they invented the triple-double for. He made everybody else on the court better. That’s what each of you is here to do.”

“Coach—”

“Run a lap! Some of you have been playing basketball for a long time, and have the advantage of entering puberty during the Bush Administration. Others have clearly confused basketball and basketweaving. Either way, we are a team. We win together or we lose together! Nobody has a good game, unless everybody has a good game! We fight and we die together! Stop crying! We shall always aspire to teamhood. Teamness. Teamosity. It was a minor; gimme a break.”

“Yes, Coach.”

“OK! Run a lap!”

But, of course, words are words and on-court glory is on-court glory and the fact that these kids — the future of basketball; the future of society — picked Jordan and Kobe and LeBron before Johnson is telling.

Later that day, on the very first play of our very first scrimmage, the biggest kid on the team — one of the most experienced — brings the ball across the line, puts his shoulder down, drives the lane and… misses. Badly.

OK, fine. Jitters. First day.

But then he does it again. And again. And again. Despite other players who were open more often than not. Despite the gentle guiding hand of his coach. Despite the innate need of human beings to gather together and distribute the risk of existence across a collective.

No passes, no looks, just a straight shot for the glory. That he kept missing was almost irrelevant.

But what can you expect, really? What gets shown on the highlight reels? What gets talked about the next day? What gets the ad contracts and the shoe deals and the unfortunate paternity suits?

You will never hear someone on ESPN say, “And here’s a solid utility player, making sure that Mr. Twenty Million Dollars actually has the ball.”

In a particularly American way, we are obsessed with the Great Man, even in the context of teams. We are drawn to stand-outs, even when their efforts don’t or can’t add up to a victory. Our fundamentally egalitarian society is at war with itself over the place of individual exceptionalism. Don’t make me go all de Tocqueville on your ass. My major was political science.

“Heroes,” some doofus once said, “rise to the occasion.” Except they don’t. They’re helped there, by teammates, by families, by society. Yes, cheering individuals is natural. They put a human face on an abstract concept like teams, or companies, or political parties. They allow us to see ourselves.

But our tendency to pack up all the glory into a nice little box and hand it entirely to one person is damaging, not only to whatever cohesiveness holds that team together, but to culture at large. Every kid who sees a strutting ball-hog feted on the tube is one step closer to trying — probable not succeeding, but trying — to be a strutting ball-hog himself. To the detriment of everybody.

Team sports are the purest sports, because they aren’t about the individual, or shouldn’t be. They’re about banding together and doing more together than you can separately. They are models for something larger. Some people are always going to stand out from the crowd they run with, but unless and until their work makes the whole better, it’s not going to add up to much. When it does, when the whole team benefits, it’s beautiful. When it doesn’t, well, that’s just one more high-profile loser.

The irony that I singled out Magic Johnson as a standard-bearer for teamwork is not lost on me. But the entire concept of a “team” needs starts somewhere. It’s not the draft or the assignments by the Rec Center and it’s certainly not SportsCenter or the maddened crowd. It’s when someone says: We can do this better together.

That kid, the big one? He’s passing now. He still palpably wants the ball, but if he doesn’t have a shot, he’ll give it to a teammate, who will then shoot and miss just as badly.

But I’m calling it progress.

basketball
Los Angeles Lakers
Magic Johnson
I, of course, am a Lakers fan.  This is as it should be, as all right-thinking people are Lakers fans.  Hating the Lakers, I thought well into my mid-thirties, is like hating sunshine.

Turns out, there are a lot of people who prefer their dank little caves instead of a day at the beach.  Even people who aren’t from Boston!

It honestly took me a decade and a half of Lakers fandom before I realized that there are people out there who genuinely dislike the team.  Even now, almost ten years on, I’m a little flabbergasted by that.  The Lakers so dominate the Los Angeles sports biosphere that even with a competing team in town the lop-sidedness in enthusiasm is overwhelming.  I didn’t even realize it was possible to hate the Lakers, like it’s not possible for something with mass to travel at the speed of light.  It’s just a law of nature, the way the universe works.

But if the Internet is good for anything, it’s good for discovering that there’s a lot of bad craziness outside of your little geographic bubble, even when your little geographic bubble includes Hollywood.  The level of vitriol is bonkers.

And I don’t get it.  I’m very well-versed in borderline sociopathic sports hatreds, and I don’t get it.  Yes, the team has been very successful.  Yes, Jack Nicholson has good seats.  Yes, the current players aren’t exactly lovable, with the possible exception of Mr. World Peace.

But none of that is about basketball or how the team plays it.  They don’t cheat, they don’t hold TV specials to announce career plans and they only rarely end up arrested.  Sometimes they’re lazy and sometimes they’re sloppy and every once in a while, they sort of deflate and bow out and let the freakin’ Mavericks win a championship.  But when it comes to basketball — averaged over the years — they’re still the best there is.

I learned to love the Lakers during Showtime, when the cool, austere Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was practically assaulted by the effusive, excitable Magic Johnson after their first game together.  How could you not love that?  There was so much talent, so much enthusiasm, that the whole city caught fire — and not in the way that Los Angeles usually catches fire.  This was sports as it should be: joyous.

Who could hate that?

They’re not the Jordan-era Bulls, when a flashy ball-hog dominated a team sport and people cheered.  They’re not the thug-era Pistons, when Bill Laimbeer only needed to color his faceguard black to complete the Darth Vader impression.  They’re not the LeBron-era Heat, when we learned that bad karma is something you wear around your neck like an albatross, and it will mess up your shooting game.

Those are teams you can hate — one-offs populated by the greedy, the self-centered, the bullies.  Not the Lakers.  They’re a storied club, rich in tradition, the essence of the game.  Think of the Celtics, but, y’know, with wins in the past two decades.  They’re rivals to my team, but honorable ones.

Is it jealousy?  Is it frustration?  Is it profound mental illness?  Nutbags have invented conspiracy theories to justify the Lakers’ success, everything from fixed drafts to biased refs to the influence of alien technology.  They pick on who the players marry, how they take care of their kids, what they change their names to, who they might possibly have raped.

And ten years into the sad realization that it is even possible to hate the Lakers, I still don’t understand how people justify it.  Hate losing to them, sure, but don’t hate them.  Over the past thirty years, nobody has done basketball better, smarter, cleaner, more elegantly or more successfully.

The Lakers are basketball.  You can’t hate one and truly love the other.

Haters Gonna Hate

I, of course, am a Lakers fan. This is as it should be, as all right-thinking people are Lakers fans. Hating the Lakers, I thought well into my mid-thirties, is like hating sunshine.

Turns out, there are a lot of people who prefer their dank little caves instead of a day at the beach. Even people who aren’t from Boston!

It honestly took me a decade and a half of Lakers fandom before I realized that there are people out there who genuinely dislike the team. Even now, almost ten years on, I’m a little flabbergasted by that. The Lakers so dominate the Los Angeles sports biosphere that even with a competing team in town the lop-sidedness in enthusiasm is overwhelming. I didn’t even realize it was possible to hate the Lakers, like it’s not possible for something with mass to travel at the speed of light. It’s just a law of nature, the way the universe works.

But if the Internet is good for anything, it’s good for discovering that there’s a lot of bad craziness outside of your little geographic bubble, even when your little geographic bubble includes Hollywood. The level of vitriol is bonkers.

And I don’t get it. I’m very well-versed in borderline sociopathic sports hatreds, and I don’t get it. Yes, the team has been very successful. Yes, Jack Nicholson has good seats. Yes, the current players aren’t exactly lovable, with the possible exception of Mr. World Peace.

But none of that is about basketball or how the team plays it. They don’t cheat, they don’t hold TV specials to announce career plans and they only rarely end up arrested. Sometimes they’re lazy and sometimes they’re sloppy and every once in a while, they sort of deflate and bow out and let the freakin’ Mavericks win a championship. But when it comes to basketball — averaged over the years — they’re still the best there is.

I learned to love the Lakers during Showtime, when the cool, austere Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was practically assaulted by the effusive, excitable Magic Johnson after their first game together. How could you not love that? There was so much talent, so much enthusiasm, that the whole city caught fire — and not in the way that Los Angeles usually catches fire. This was sports as it should be: joyous.

Who could hate that?

They’re not the Jordan-era Bulls, when a flashy ball-hog dominated a team sport and people cheered. They’re not the thug-era Pistons, when Bill Laimbeer only needed to color his faceguard black to complete the Darth Vader impression. They’re not the LeBron-era Heat, when we learned that bad karma is something you wear around your neck like an albatross, and it will mess up your shooting game.

Those are teams you can hate — one-offs populated by the greedy, the self-centered, the bullies. Not the Lakers. They’re a storied club, rich in tradition, the essence of the game. Think of the Celtics, but, y’know, with wins in the past two decades. They’re rivals to my team, but honorable ones.

Is it jealousy? Is it frustration? Is it profound mental illness? Nutbags have invented conspiracy theories to justify the Lakers’ success, everything from fixed drafts to biased refs to the influence of alien technology. They pick on who the players marry, how they take care of their kids, what they change their names to, who they might possibly have raped.

And ten years into the sad realization that it is even possible to hate the Lakers, I still don’t understand how people justify it. Hate losing to them, sure, but don’t hate them. Over the past thirty years, nobody has done basketball better, smarter, cleaner, more elegantly or more successfully.

The Lakers are basketball. You can’t hate one and truly love the other.

basketball
Los Angeles Lakers

LeBron James, America’s Sweetheart?

So I’m perusing the internet yesterday, as one does when they get home from work and are putting off making dinner, and I come across a blog or a tweet or a Facebook status (they all blend together at one point; it may have actually been a Google+ post) saying something about LeBron James being on a list of great things about America. My initial reaction was “Huh?” and figuring I read that wrong, did a little research.

And there it was. On CNN. Well, the CNN/Money/Fortune page. Nice conglomeration there. I guess CNN is doing their part to keep the internet small and tidy. Apparently they are also doing their part to embarrass the hell out of America. 

The list is titled 100 Great Things About America, authored by managing editor Andy Serwer, henceforth known as The Man Who Hates America.

Out of the 100 things on that list there were about five where I found myself saying “Yea, ok, I’ll give him that.” The rest - among them a pickup truck, TMZ, Exxon, LinkedIn, the Kardashians and Detroit - made it seem like Serwer got his assignment mixed up and he was supposed to come up with 100 Awful, Horrifying Things About America. But hey, he’s the managing editor so I imagine this whole thing was his idea to begin with. And really, I would have just laughed it off if it weren’t for number 33 on the list of things Americans should feel proud of.

LeBron James.

Number 33 on a list called 100 Great Things About America. The man who, at this point in his career, is one of the most hated stars in all of sports.

What is it about LeBron James that makes him a great part of America? Is it his greed and selfishness? Is it the way he worships at the altar of himself? Is it the way he shoots his mouth off? Is it his clutch play? Is it the way he brings a team together with his leadership to win the big games? I’ve got two more rings than that guy. Sure, they’re wedding rings and they’re both useless at this point, but that won’t stop me from throwing a joke in here about his lack of championship rings.

I can think of so many sports stars who are more fitting to use as a testament to America’s greatness. Tim Duncan. Kurt Warner. Derek JeterPeja Stojakovic. The guy’s not even American and he should make the list ahead of LeBron. I’d even rather see Shaq sitting there at number 33 and that’s saying a lot being that I’ve never forgiven him for the fifteen bucks and two hours of my life lost when I took my kids to see Kazaam

Under LeBron’s name on the list, Serwer writes: Will America’s biggest loser become a sympathetic figure?

I’m not quite sure how that gets one to qualify as a great thing about a country along with the Navy Seals, Steve Jobs and the Grand Canyon but I’m sure the answer to that question is a resounding no. Any chance he had at garnering sympathy from people who were already on the hate-wagon after the LeBron James ESPN Power Hour (one year ago today!) was lost when, after the Mavericks took the championship from the Heat, he said “All the people that were rooting on me to fail, at the end of the day, they have to wake up tomorrow and have the same life that they had before they woke up today. They have the same personal problems they had today.”

In other words “I’m still rich and famous and you’re not.” 

Yea, well we still have one thing in common, LeBron. We have the same amount of NBA championships under our belts. 

There are far better people who could have filled the 33rd spot on that list, among them the fans of the Miami Heat who have to suffer with LeBron’s bloviating. Sure, he may win a title or two while he’s with the team, but he’s still gotta be insufferable to have around.

basketball
NBA
LeBron James

Basketball lockout: please make it go away

As designated “business guy” on the American McCarver team, I was asked by Mike to write about the basketball lockout. Quite frankly, I never follow basketball until the playoffs and even then, it seems like the winner is pre-ordained and I find it only semi-interesting (although +1 to the NBA for giving the Mavericks this year’s victory). But I do like business, negotiations and conflict and there’s a bunch of that going on in basketball (and football) right now. My take:

We have no idea what’s going on and anyone who thinks we do is wrong. Professional sports is legalized thuggery where monopolies are either blessed or ignored. Teams are owned by rich folks who keep their financials opaque and leagues are just pass through devices for TV contracts and merchandise deals. Journalists who write about the business of sports?  The most out to lunch, they’re the guys who can’t write for the business pages or the sports pages so they get the business sports beat. Here’s one argument for why the NBA lockout will settle quickly:

…[A]lmost half of the players in the NBA ask for advances on their paychecks during any given month, frequently because they spend a high percentage of their earnings, their cash is tied up in illiquid investments, and more than a handful are legally bound to support women they are not married to but have had children with.

Sorry Mike but I’m having a hard time caring about this issue. The more I read, the more I hope they figure it out quickly for the simple reason that I don’t want to have to see more stories like this. Some things aren’t worth looking behind the curtain — and I don’t believe we get to peek anyway.

basketball
Lockout
Business
So Ron Artest has pretty clearly been working on himself.  Remember, between jumping into the stands to start punching fans in 2004 and the announcement that he’s changing his name to Metta World Peace this week, he thanked his therapist on national television after the the Lakers’ championship win in 2010.  And then actioned off the ring he got to benefit a mental health charity.

Yeah, yeah, make your jokes.  But in the big-ego, me-first world of professional basketball, introspection — much less actual personal improvement — is as rare as a LeBron fan. When even the nice guys have Superman logos tattooed on their arms, and the dumb ones think they’re so good at basketball that they can play baseball, to see someone acknowledge a larger world, much less draw attention to a larger goal for it, is nice to see.  This isn’t an awkward post-season PSA or community service as a condition of parole — you change your name out of deeply held belief.  Lew Alcindor to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Cassius Clay to Muhammad Ali, Rod Smart to He Hate Me.  This is perhaps the most public way to announce to the sport, the fans, the world, what’s important to you.  It’s your identity.

Ron — Metta — has obviously been through it, and come out the other side a better man.  Good for him, and — in some small way — good for all of us, too.

I Never Metta World Peace I Didn't Like

So Ron Artest has pretty clearly been working on himself. Remember, between jumping into the stands to start punching fans in 2004 and the announcement that he’s changing his name to Metta World Peace this week, he thanked his therapist on national television after the the Lakers’ championship win in 2010. And then actioned off the ring he got to benefit a mental health charity.

Yeah, yeah, make your jokes. But in the big-ego, me-first world of professional basketball, introspection — much less actual personal improvement — is as rare as a LeBron fan. When even the nice guys have Superman logos tattooed on their arms, and the dumb ones think they’re so good at basketball that they can play baseball, to see someone acknowledge a larger world, much less draw attention to a larger goal for it, is nice to see. This isn’t an awkward post-season PSA or community service as a condition of parole — you change your name out of deeply held belief. Lew Alcindor to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Cassius Clay to Muhammad Ali, Rod Smart to He Hate Me. This is perhaps the most public way to announce to the sport, the fans, the world, what’s important to you. It’s your identity.

Ron — Metta — has obviously been through it, and come out the other side a better man. Good for him, and — in some small way — good for all of us, too.

Ron Artest
basketball
Los Angeles Lakers

You are trying to view American McCarver on a shitty browser. Won't work.

Go full screen.